Harry Potter's Magic

The Potter controversy shows that the struggle between science and magic isn't entirely settled.

Excerpted from "A Visit to Vanity Fair," by Alan Jacobs, Brazos Press, 2001.

It was not obvious in advance that science would succeed and magic fail. In fact, several centuries of dedicated scientific experiment would have to pass before it was clear to anyone that the "scientific" physician could do more to cure illness than the old woman of the village with her herbs and potions and muttered charms.

More Harry

Potter, Parody and Paranoia
By Anne Morse

Pagans on Potter
From our boards

Don't Mess with the Occult

Harry's Star Chart

Discussion
Satan's Little Messenger?

Advertisement

Isaac Newton, whose name is associated more than any other with physical mechanics, was continually absorbed by alchemical research, as John Maynard Keynes, the famous economist, learned when, in 1936, he bought Newton's alchemical manuscripts at auction. A stunned Keynes wrote a paper in which he revealed that Newton, far from being "the first and greatest...rationalist," was instead "the last of the magicians."

This history provides a key to understanding the role of magic in Joanne Rowling's books, for she begins by positing a counterfactual history, a history in which magic was not a false and incompetent discipline but rather a means of controlling the physical world at least as potent as experimental science.

Did you like this? Share with your family and friends.
comments powered by Disqus

Advertisement

Advertisement

DiggDeliciousNewsvineRedditStumbleTechnoratiFacebook