Beliefnet
  
advertisement

Will Roberts Defend Religious Liberty?

Let's pray that a Justice John Roberts will ensure equal, rather than hostile, treatment of religious expression in America.
By Nathan Diament



Print Page

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was the Supreme Court's swing vote on many issues over the past quarter-century, especially in religious liberty cases. On cases involving prayer in public schools, government aid, and vouchers for parochial schools, legal accommodations and exemptions for religious conscience, and many others the decisions were often decided by O'Connor, and the jurisprudence shaped by her separate concurring opinion.

Enter John Roberts.

While everyone is speculating on abortion and other hot-button social issues, we can be sure his views and votes on religious liberty will change the court.

We won't have to wait long to see how. This term the court will hear Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita, a case in which it must evaluate whether the First Amendment's clause guaranteeing the "free exercise of religion" allows the federal government to ban a religious sect from using an otherwise illegal natural herb to make a hallucinogenic drug as part of their religious worship. While it may seem to be an idiosyncratic case unlikely to affect most Americans, it will immediately test Roberts' views on the scope of exemptions or accommodations religious adherents can demand the government make from otherwise generally applicable laws.

What will he do? During his tenure as a federal appellate judge for the past two years, Judge Roberts has not had the opportunity to rule squarely on a religious liberty case. But during a previous post, as Principal Deputy Solicitor General in President George H.W. Bush's administration, Roberts was involved in two significant cases--Lee v. Weisman in 1992 and Mergens v. Westside Community School District in 1990. In each of these cases, although the federal government was not a litigant in the case, the Department of Justice, through the Solicitor General's office, engaged in the standard practice of filing "friend of the court" briefs in support of one the parties to the case. In Weisman and in Mergens, Roberts was an author of these briefs.

While Roberts wrote the briefs as an attorney representing a client-as opposed to an academic law-review article expounding his own views-the liberal group People for the American Way has called the Weisman brief, and Roberts, "radical." A white paper published on the group's website said Roberts' brief "went far beyond the case at hand" and, had its position been adopted by the court, it would have "resulted in public school students being subjected to religious coercion."
Read more >>


_Related Features
  • Clues on Roberts' Church-State Views: His Controversial Briefs
  • The Big Questions Roberts May Face--And Clues on How He'll Handle Them
  • A Coup for Business, But What About Religion?

  • « Prev Page Next Page »
    Page  | 2 

    Print Page
    Nathan Diament is director of public policy for the Union of Orthodox Jewish Congregations.

    advertisement
    Poll
    Are you happy with Bush's choice for Supreme Court nominee?
    Yes
    No
    I don't know

    vote       View Results
    Talk About It

    Related Features

    related
    An Even-Handed Jurist?
    Religious conservatives should be careful what they wish for. By Marci Hamilton

    What Roberts is Up Against
    The four controversial constitutional questions a Justice Roberts will confront and clues to how he will handle them. By Samuel Estreicher

    Clues on Church-State Views
    Excerpts from Roberts' briefs on religion in public schools.

    Abortion, Gays, and Religious Displays
    The big issues the new justice will face. By Michael Kress

    Faiths & Practices | Inspiration | Health | Entertainment | Comfort & Support | Family & Home
    Relationships | News & Blogs | Audio/Video | Discussions | Ecards | Prayer Circles | Meditations | Quizzes
    Copyright © 2008 Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved.
    Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service
    and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.