We all develop an insecure or secure bond with our original families. That bond is referred to as an attachment style. The more secure the bond, the better you will deal with conflict.
Two bonding styles make conflict difficult–anxious and avoidant. To feel more secure you want to lower your anxiety and stop avoiding. So take a look at these attachment styles and see where you tend to fall. These are general descriptions. You may lean toward one style more than another.
1. Secure Type (Low Avoidance, Low Anxiety)
Secure people . . .
are generally happy in their relationships
are sensitive and responsive to others
think of connection as comfort and support
feel loved, accepted, and competent
can bring up issues and don’t worry that their relationships are at stake
listen, value, and have empathy for other people
2. Preoccupied Type (Low Avoidance, High Anxiety)
Preoccupied people . . .
worry about what others think of them
don’t consider their own thoughts and feelings
need to be close to others but do it in a clingy way
need validation and approval
are concerned that others don’t value them
doubt their own worth in relationships
3. Dismissing-Avoidant Type (High Avoidance, Low Anxiety)
Dismissive and avoidant people . . .
deny their need to be close to others
need to feel independent and self-sufficient
minimize how important relationships are
hide their feelings from self and others
think of others in less than positive ways
cope by distancing
4. Fearful-Avoidant Type (High Avoidance, High Anxiety)
Fearful, avoidant people . . .
think of themselves as flawed, dependent, and helpless
think they are not worth loving or being cared about
don’t trust others
expect to be hurt
want to be close to others but fear this
avoid intimacy
suppress feelings
Now that you know your attachment style, take the free conflict style quiz!
Source: Adapted from We Need to Talk by Dr. Linda Mintle (Baker, 2015)
Attachment styles: Kim Bartholomew and Leonard Horowitz, “Attachment Styles Among Young Adults: A Test of a Four Category Model. ” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61 (1991): 226-44.