In order to be a
warrior in the battle for culture it is crucial that we begin to pick apart the
pseudo-philosophies of the relativist not only so as to stand firm in our
convictions but also to have the pleasure of seeing how stupid and vacuous what
passes for enlightenment actually is. We start by taking bullet points and
responding with reason not emotion. Get in this habit and you’ll do much to
expose the evil that is relativism. Example;

Lets start with some
basic sound bite philosophy of the left and see how it holds up shall we?

Here’s a classic,

“Nobody has the right
to tell a woman what to do with her body.”

Most people stop
there. I mean how can you argue such depth right?

The idiocy of the
statement that the PCeople stand on assumes that this concept is self-evident.
Who am I to tell you what is “right” for your body?

This somehow tries to
separate our biological mechanics from our behavioral choices, as though your
body is separate from your intentions.

Ironically the idea of
limiting what your body is allowed to do is the basis for virtually EVERY law
we have! Lets play this out in real time shall we?

Next time your
speeding and get pulled over try this. First, call the cop an intolerant bigot
for stopping you. Then say, ” how dare you tell my body how fast it can travel in a vehicle? Who are you to dictate to
me the velocity my body chooses to
move?”

When you get out of
jail tell me how well that worked out for ya promise?

Don’t pay for
groceries anymore either. Just take what you want and leave, when the store
complains tell them they have no right refusing your body from sustenance.

Of course left-thought
would counter that you are infringing on someone else’s body by taking what was
rightfully theirs first. But whose body takes precedent and whose body makes
the rules?

Of course anyone with
a brain knows this isn’t accurate anyways since what you do with your body ends
when it begins to affect my body; for example when my body decides to kill your
body we usually rule that out as an acceptable body choice.

Next time you run into
a relativist ask them by what philosophical grounds they use to tell me that if
my body chooses to kill yours, I shouldn’t. They will reply it’s because what
you do with your body is your choice until it harms or affects others bodies in
a detrimental way.

At this point start
your sly grin or in my case a smirk and then ask them when it was they became
pro-life?

I live in a country
whose intellectual “elite” argue for the right of a women’s body to kill
another woman’s body as long as that other woman’s body is safely contained
inside the aforementioned woman’s body.

Apparently first one
out of the womb wins. The fact that we have in-vitro surgery for babies woman want, and yet at anytime this same woman can destroy this same child simply by changing her
perception of it so as to change its name from child to choice is the single
most evil law the United States has ever thought of conceiving.

Slavery is a close
second of course yet that horrific chapter in our country at least allowed for
most of them to live. This is the grand irony amongst the African-American
culture. Talk about legal lynching. The amounts of black babies aborted in this
country yearly alone outweigh every lynched black American in the Jim Crowe
era.

What amazes me is when these facts are presented the secularist becomes livid and attacks your character and your motives. Nothing throws a new progressive for a loop more, than when the facts contradict there ideology. Kinda sucks when life is what it is, and not what you pretend it to be huh? 

 


More from Beliefnet and our partners