Inspiration
Faith & Prayer
Health &
Wellness
Entertainment
Love &
Family
Newsletters
Special Offers
Lynn v. Sekulow
Barry, Do You Want a Statue of Tyranny?
By
Jay Sekulow
It was an hour of spirited, lively debate before the Supreme Court. And, now that oral arguments have concluded and the case is in the hands of the Justices, I am hopeful that the Supreme Court will determine that the appeals court got it wrong and uphold the authority of Pleasant Grove City, Utah to…
Jay, You Are Making Me Even More Nervous
By
Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Your latest post on Summum should make it clear to lawyers and non-lawyers alike that this case was, is and should forever be seem as a case about whether the government can prefer some religions over others and promote their preferred messages. If, as you put it, Pleasant Grove is “engaging in government speech which…
Supreme Court Must Protect Nation’s Heritage Displayed in America’s Cities
By
Jay Sekulow
Barry, as you note, the Summum group did not bring an Establishment Clause challenge in this case. In this First Amendment case, we believe the Supreme Court is faced with an easy choice: preserve sound precedent involving the well-established distinction between government speech and private speech – or permit a twisted interpretation of the Constitution…
RELIGION IN SUPREME COURT FOR WRONG REASON
By
Rev. Barry W. Lynn
Pleasant Grove City, Utah, has a website. It also has a park. In that park is a monument containing the Ten Commandments. Some years back, a religious group called Summum asked to put up its own monument in the same park. Summum’s beliefs are encapsulated in what are called the “Seven Aphorisms.” The city rejected the…
1
2
3
4
archives
most recent
search
this
blog
More from Beliefnet and our partners
More from Beliefnet and our partners