Inspiration Faith & Prayer Health & Wellness Entertainment Love & Family
Newsletters Special Offers

Well, Jay, the Supreme Court got it partially right yesterday by conceding the obvious: that when a city accepts any monument from a private party and puts it up as a permanent display in a park, that represents “government speech.” It concluded that the city controls the messages it wants to convey to the public.…

Barry, the Supreme Court today reached the proper conclusion in a case we argued in November.  Without dissent, the Justices issued what I believe is a landmark decision clearing the way for governments to accept permanent monuments of its choosing in public parks.  The decision comes in the case of Pleasant Grove City v. Summum,…

So, the Supreme Court has accepted the case of Salazar v. Buono involving cross erected on public land. The first and foremost point which we must not lose sight of in this case is that this cross was a religious symbol when it was put up over 70 years ago and it remains a religious symbol…

OK, Barry, it took a while – more than a few posts – but I am pleased you finally articulated your opposition to bringing back the Fairness Doctrine. I only hope you can agree with me on this one. The Supreme Court today agreed to take an important religion case out of California where a…
archives most recent
search this blog
More from Beliefnet and our partners
More from Beliefnet and our partners