It’s not flip-flopping, it’s nuance! I think it’s funny that Dodd’s sensible answer caused Clinton to change her answer:

” This is a privilege,” Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) said. “And look, I’m as forthright and progressive on immigration policy as anyone here, but we’re dealing with a serious problem here. We need to have people come forward. The idea that we’re going to extend this privilege here of a driver’s license, I think, is troublesome. And I think the American people are reacting to it. ”

Clinton attempted to clarify her own response: “I just want to add, I did not say that it should be done, but I certainly recognize why Gov. Spitzer is trying to do it. And we have failed….

“Wait a minute,” Dodd interrupted. “No, no, no. You said yes, you thought it made sense to do it.

“No, I didn’t, Chris,” Clinton said. “But the point is, what are we going to do with all these illegal immigrants who are (driving )?”

“Well, that’s a legitimate issue,” Dodd said. “But driver’s license goes too far, in my view. ”

” Well, you may say that,” Clinton said, “but what is the identification if somebody runs into you today who is an undocumented worker?'”What Gov. Spitzer has agreed to do is to have three different licenses, one that provides identification for actually going onto airplanes and other kinds of security issues, another which is an ordinary driver’s license, and then a special card that identifies the people who would be on the road,” the senator from New York said.

It certainly sounds like she supports it to me.

(via)