Just a few minutes ago, in the car on the way to school, I remarked that today was the feast of St. Bartholomew (Nathaneal in John’s Gospel) , and I reminded Katie of the series of statues of the apostles in St. John Lateran – with each of them holding, as they always do, some instrument symbolic of them, sometimes of their martyrdom.

"Oh!" she interrupted, "He was the one holding his skin!"

See…travel is the best education.

So yes, that’s what Bartholomew doing in the image over there to the left – it’s from Michelangelo’s Last Judgment  in the Sistine Chapel. And here’s the statue in St. John Lateran:

Mike Aquilina on Augustine on Bartholomew

From the Office of Readings, not directly related to Bartholomew, but on the Apostles in general, from St. John Chyrsostom found at Universalis.com

Paul had this in mind when he said: The weakness of God is stronger than men. That the preaching of these men was indeed divine is brought home to us in the same way. For how otherwise could twelve uneducated men, who lived on lakes and rivers and wastelands, get the idea for such an immense enterprise? How could men who perhaps had never been in a city or a public square think of setting out to do battle with the whole world? That they were fearful, timid men, the evangelist makes clear; he did not reject the fact or try to hide their weaknesses. Indeed he turned these into a proof of the truth. What did he say of them? That when Christ was arrested, the others fled, despite all the miracles they had seen, while he who was leader of the others denied him!

How then account for the fact that these men, who in Christ’s lifetime did not stand up to the attacks by the Jews, set forth to do battle with the whole world once Christ was dead – if, as you claim, Christ did not rise and speak to them and rouse their courage? Did they perhaps say to themselves: “What is this? He could not save himself but he will protect us? He did not help himself when he was alive, but now that he is dead he will extend a helping hand to us? In his lifetime he brought no nation under his banner, but by uttering his name we will win over the whole world?” Would it not be wholly irrational even to think such thoughts, much less to act upon them?

It is evident, then, that if they had not seen him risen and had proof of his power, they would not have risked so much.

There you go. We often say that there’s really new under the sun – and there isn’t. People have been leveling the same doubts and questions about Christianity for almsot two thousand years…and the old answers still make a lot of sense, don’t they?